Latvian vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Latvian
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Latvians
Laotians
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Latvian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,672,614 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.046% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 46.0 Laotians.
Latvian vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $47,041, a difference of 11.9%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $59,351, a difference of 7.0%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $112,859, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $66,306, a difference of 1.5%), median household income ($97,311 compared to $94,990, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $54,369, a difference of 3.0%).
Income Metric | Latvian | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,649 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $120,301 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $97,311 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $53,001 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $63,498 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,941 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Excellent $52,783 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $108,926 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $115,957 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,326 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Poor 26.4% |
Latvian vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 20.9%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.27%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Poverty Metric | Latvian | Laotian |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Exceptional 9.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.5% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.2% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.4% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.5% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Latvian vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.56%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 3.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Latvian | Laotian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.0% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Latvian vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.41%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Latvian | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.5% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.9% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.1% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.4% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.8% | Good 82.9% |
Latvian vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.2%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.3%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.0%), currently married (48.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Latvian | Laotian |
Family Households | Tragic 62.8% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.5% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Latvian vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.79%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 8.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Latvian | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.3% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.2% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Latvian vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.1%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.1%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%).
Education Level Metric | Latvian | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.2% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.0% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.2% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 71.6% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 66.1% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 53.9% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 46.1% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.8% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Latvian vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.58%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Disability Metric | Latvian | Laotian |
Disability | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.1% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.6% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Excellent 2.4% |