Costa Rican vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 156,555,723 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Costa Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Costa Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Costa Ricans corresponds to an increase of 11.8 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,565 compared to $104,993, a difference of 9.9%), median male earnings ($54,279 compared to $59,351, a difference of 9.3%), and median household income ($87,262 compared to $94,990, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,106 compared to $54,369, a difference of 2.4%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and median female earnings ($39,622 compared to $42,133, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.9% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 2.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and male poverty (11.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.41%), female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.75%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 14.8%), single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.6%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.070%), family households (65.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 8.3%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.56%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.9% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 24.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.0%), 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Costa Rican and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.65%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.3%).