Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,497,648 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 6.6 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,529 compared to $47,394, a difference of 19.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $97,880, a difference of 19.0%), and median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $57,352, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $51,914, a difference of 8.3%), householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $63,643, a difference of 9.0%), and median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $41,527, a difference of 9.4%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,529 | Exceptional $47,394 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $93,593 | Exceptional $108,830 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $77,559 | Exceptional $89,496 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $43,416 | Exceptional $48,913 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,201 | Exceptional $57,352 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,965 | Exceptional $41,527 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,916 | Fair $51,914 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,254 | Excellent $97,880 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,293 | Exceptional $104,992 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,375 | Exceptional $63,643 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Good 25.3% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 26.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.88%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Families | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.1% | Good 19.8% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Single Males | Good 12.7% | Good 12.6% |
| Single Females | Tragic 22.3% | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Good 16.1% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.1% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.1% | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.7% | Exceptional 66.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 80.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Exceptional 38.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.6% | Exceptional 75.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.3%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 15.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.50%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (61.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Family Households | Tragic 61.9% | Tragic 63.5% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 27.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Average 46.3% |
| Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Good 6.2% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 43.0% | Average 46.7% |
| Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Excellent 11.9% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.9% | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 4.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.38%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Excellent 9.9% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Excellent 90.2% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.4% | Good 55.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Fair 19.1% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.9%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.4%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.5% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 95.5% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 92.9% | Exceptional 94.4% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Exceptional 93.4% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 92.1% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Exceptional 90.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.4% | Exceptional 87.1% |
| College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 68.9% |
| College, 1 year or more | Poor 58.0% | Exceptional 63.3% |
| Associate's Degree | Poor 44.7% | Exceptional 50.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.6% | Exceptional 42.6% |
| Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 17.4% |
| Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 12.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Disability | Good 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Good 11.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Fair 6.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.1% | Exceptional 22.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Good 47.2% |
| Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Good 3.0% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Poor 17.5% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.3% |