Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cheyenne
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cheyenne

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Poor
Exceptional
1,791
SOCIAL INDEX
15.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
287th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Cheyenne Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,015,281 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Cheyenne communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cheyenne within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.083% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cheyenne corresponds to an increase of 82.6 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Cheyenne Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($76,362 compared to $104,992, a difference of 37.5%), per capita income ($35,276 compared to $47,394, a difference of 34.4%), and median family income ($81,385 compared to $108,830, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,275 compared to $51,914, a difference of 14.7%), and median female earnings ($35,673 compared to $41,527, a difference of 16.4%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,276
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Tragic
$81,385
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,974
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,233
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,062
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,673
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,275
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$79,152
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$76,362
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,096
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.3%
Good
25.3%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 117.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (28.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 79.0%), and family poverty (14.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 74.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.7%), and single male poverty (16.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 28.0%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Tragic
18.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.1%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
28.3%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
16.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.7%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.5%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
9.9%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (10.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 149.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (16.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 104.3%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 98.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.4%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.3%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
5.2%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (74.8% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.9%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.0%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.4%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
80.3%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
79.5%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
77.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 36.3%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.2%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.48%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.47 compared to 3.19, a difference of 8.9%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Tragic
63.2%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.4%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.3%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.47
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.2%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.4%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.3%
Excellent
30.3%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.9%), no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.8%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.7%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Poor
6.0%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 55.3%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 48.5%), and bachelor's degree (29.4% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.070%), 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.10%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Average
94.9%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.6%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.7%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
60.6%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.1%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.7%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.2%

Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cheyenne and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (31.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 39.6%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (50.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.3%).
Cheyenne vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricCheyenneImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
31.1%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.9%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.0%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%