Argentinean vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,107,576 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.118. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 8.3 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 6.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,111 compared to $97,880, a difference of 5.3%), and per capita income ($49,862 compared to $47,394, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $41,527, a difference of 1.0%), householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $63,643, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($50,399 compared to $48,913, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.59%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.64%), and poverty (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.23%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.69%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.84%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.4%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (63.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.3%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.1%).