Immigrants from Nigeria vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,688,406 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Nigeria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.336. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nigeria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nigeria corresponds to an increase of 46.7 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,339 compared to $47,394, a difference of 17.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,589 compared to $97,880, a difference of 13.0%), and median family income ($96,439 compared to $108,830, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,174 compared to $51,914, a difference of 5.6%), median female earnings ($39,294 compared to $41,527, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,942 compared to $63,643, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 31.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and family poverty (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.99%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.9% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.1%), births to unmarried women (35.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 16.7%), and currently married (43.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 19.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.090%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.7%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.1%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.66%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nigeria and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 15.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.55%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.71%).