Guatemalan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,715,682 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to an increase of 11.6 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,766 compared to $47,394, a difference of 25.5%), median family income ($88,295 compared to $108,830, a difference of 23.3%), and median male earnings ($46,736 compared to $57,352, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $51,914, a difference of 0.76%), wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 12.0%), and median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $41,527, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 61.9%), receiving food stamps (14.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 44.9%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.2%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 24.3%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.9%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 85.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 54.8%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 14.8%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.3%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.47%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.6%).