Immigrants from Italy vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,157,607 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Italy communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.476. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Italy within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.134% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Italy corresponds to an increase of 133.7 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,201 compared to $97,880, a difference of 7.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,434 compared to $104,992, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,449 compared to $51,914, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,065 compared to $63,643, a difference of 0.66%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $41,527, a difference of 2.2%), and per capita income ($48,654 compared to $47,394, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 7.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.25%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.32%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.8%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.14%), births to unmarried women (29.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 11.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.99%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.1%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and college, 1 year or more (61.2% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Italy and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.6%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.82%), male disability (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.7%).