Ugandan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,834,443 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Ugandan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.113. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ugandans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ugandans corresponds to an increase of 5.2 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 5.3%), per capita income ($45,047 compared to $47,394, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,177 compared to $63,643, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,667 compared to $97,880, a difference of 1.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,472 compared to $104,992, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($40,889 compared to $41,527, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 23.1%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 22.8%), and male poverty (12.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.79%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 49.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (43.8% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.7%), currently married (44.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.81%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 9.9%), bachelor's degree (40.8% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and associate's degree (48.7% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ugandan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.25%), male disability (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.9%).