Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Nicaragua
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Nicaragua

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Fair
Exceptional
3,407
SOCIAL INDEX
31.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
221st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Nicaragua Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,743,109 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.089. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to an increase of 0.7 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from Nicaragua Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,065 compared to $47,394, a difference of 24.5%), median family income ($88,267 compared to $108,830, a difference of 23.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,085 compared to $63,643, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $51,914, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($84,914 compared to $97,880, a difference of 15.3%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,065
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,267
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Tragic
$76,784
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,737
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,482
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$36,023
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,266
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,914
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$89,108
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,085
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.0%
Good
25.3%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 73.3%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 63.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.22%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 7.9%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.9%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Good
16.2%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
17.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
17.2%
Exceptional
9.9%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.4%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.9%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Average
82.7%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 25.2%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.2%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.37 compared to 3.19, a difference of 5.6%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Exceptional
67.5%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.2%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.5%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.7%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.3%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
38.0%
Excellent
30.3%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.67%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.11%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.67%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Good
9.9%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.4%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.2%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 60.8%), and master's degree (11.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 47.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.1%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.9%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.6%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.4%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.3%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.7%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.37%), male disability (10.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from NicaraguaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.8%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%