French vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,759,437 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within French communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French corresponds to an increase of 19.4 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 13.2%), per capita income ($43,685 compared to $47,394, a difference of 8.5%), and median female earnings ($38,457 compared to $41,527, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,230 compared to $51,914, a difference of 1.3%), median male earnings ($55,350 compared to $57,352, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,665 compared to $97,880, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 13.6%), and single father poverty (18.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.16%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 20.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 10.2%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.92%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 32.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 25.7%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.1%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.1% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 40.4%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 27.1%), and male disability (13.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.0%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 7.4%).