Immigrants from Bahamas vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,058,426 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Bahamas communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.191% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bahamas corresponds to an increase of 191.3 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($84,732 compared to $108,830, a difference of 28.4%), per capita income ($37,193 compared to $47,394, a difference of 27.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,910 compared to $97,880, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($45,793 compared to $51,914, a difference of 13.4%), median female earnings ($35,027 compared to $41,527, a difference of 18.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,174 compared to $63,643, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 58.4%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 43.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (22.7% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 8.0%), single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 35.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.54%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (40.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 32.2%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 29.5%), and divorced or separated (13.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.25%), average family size (3.27 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.0%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.0%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 39.3%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bahamas and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.1%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 15.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.1%).