Bermudan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,819,926 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Bermudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bermudans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.326% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bermudans corresponds to an increase of 326.1 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($97,577 compared to $108,830, a difference of 11.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,197 compared to $104,992, a difference of 11.5%), and median household income ($80,406 compared to $89,496, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,418 compared to $41,527, a difference of 5.3%), median earnings ($45,593 compared to $48,913, a difference of 7.3%), and median male earnings ($52,465 compared to $57,352, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 30.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 21.4%), and family poverty (9.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.2%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 30.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 18.1%), births to unmarried women (35.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and married-couple households (42.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.22%), family households (62.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.5%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bermudan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 15.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.67%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.4%).