Immigrants from England vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,882,621 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.768. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.632% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 631.7 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,446 compared to $104,992, a difference of 4.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,020 compared to $97,880, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $51,914, a difference of 0.19%), median female earnings ($41,277 compared to $41,527, a difference of 0.61%), and median earnings ($49,722 compared to $48,913, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.35%), receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.6%), married-couple households (48.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.3%), family households (64.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.6%), bachelor's degree (41.4% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and master's degree (17.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.6%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.18%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.7%).