French American Indian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,877,197 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within French American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.888. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.619% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French American Indians corresponds to an increase of 618.5 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($40,244 compared to $47,394, a difference of 17.8%), median family income ($92,872 compared to $108,830, a difference of 17.2%), and median household income ($76,387 compared to $89,496, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 0.10%), householder income under 25 years ($48,977 compared to $51,914, a difference of 6.0%), and median female earnings ($36,920 compared to $41,527, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 35.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (20.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 31.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 8.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 20.7%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.16%), family households (62.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.8%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.14%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 40.2%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.5%), and master's degree (12.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French American Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 28.7%), male disability (13.4% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 23.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.1%).