Osage vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,779,076 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.860. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.053% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to an increase of 53.0 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,568 compared to $47,394, a difference of 19.8%), median household income ($75,240 compared to $89,496, a difference of 19.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $104,992, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income under 25 years ($45,764 compared to $51,914, a difference of 13.4%), and median male earnings ($50,292 compared to $57,352, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (16.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 30.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 30.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 13.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.39%), family households (63.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.5%), master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 38.8%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 51.7%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 38.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.9%).