Filipino vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,732,977 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Filipino communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.144. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Filipinos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Filipinos corresponds to an increase of 6.0 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,723 compared to $97,880, a difference of 31.5%), median male earnings ($74,224 compared to $57,352, a difference of 29.4%), and median household income ($115,509 compared to $89,496, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,740 compared to $51,914, a difference of 11.2%), wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and median female earnings ($49,508 compared to $41,527, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (11.6% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 36.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (11.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 36.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 15.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 19.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 32.0%), single mother households (4.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 31.3%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.33%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.6%), and family households (65.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.58%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.2%), professional degree (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 43.5%), and master's degree (23.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.2% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.080%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and 6th grade (97.3% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Filipino and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 32.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 27.3%), and vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.9%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.0%).