Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Guatemala
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Guatemala
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
1,504
SOCIAL INDEX
12.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
304th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Guatemala Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,127,831 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to an increase of 15.1 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,550 compared to $47,394, a difference of 26.2%), median family income ($87,191 compared to $108,830, a difference of 24.8%), and median male earnings ($46,244 compared to $57,352, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $51,914, a difference of 0.91%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $41,527, a difference of 17.2%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,550 | Exceptional $47,394 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $87,191 | Exceptional $108,830 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $75,123 | Exceptional $89,496 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $40,851 | Exceptional $48,913 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,244 | Exceptional $57,352 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,444 | Exceptional $41,527 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,447 | Fair $51,914 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $81,341 | Excellent $97,880 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $86,573 | Exceptional $104,992 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,950 | Exceptional $63,643 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.5% | Good 25.3% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 65.4%), receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 47.2%), and family poverty (12.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.3%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.3%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Poverty | Tragic 15.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Families | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Males | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Females | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.9% | Good 19.8% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.6% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.9% | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Good 12.6% |
| Single Females | Tragic 24.1% | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Good 16.1% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 33.3% | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.1% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.7%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Good 8.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 66.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Exceptional 80.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 38.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 75.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 33.4%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.4%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (65.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Tragic 63.5% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.8% | Exceptional 27.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.8% | Average 46.3% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.41 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Good 6.2% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 42.6% | Average 46.7% |
| Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.5% | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 13.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.9%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.2% | Excellent 9.9% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.9% | Excellent 90.2% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.5% | Good 55.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Fair 19.1% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 91.8%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 57.3%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.6% | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 94.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 91.3% | Exceptional 96.5% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 90.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 89.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 87.4% | Exceptional 94.4% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 85.8% | Exceptional 93.4% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.0% | Exceptional 92.1% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 81.4% | Exceptional 90.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.9% | Exceptional 87.1% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.2% | Exceptional 68.9% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 50.7% | Exceptional 63.3% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.1% | Exceptional 50.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.8% | Exceptional 42.6% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 11.6% | Exceptional 17.4% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants from Guatemala vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 15.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.95%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Guatemala | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Disability | Good 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Good 11.0% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Good 5.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Fair 6.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.7% | Exceptional 22.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.1% | Good 47.2% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Good 3.0% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Poor 17.5% |
| Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |