Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lumbee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsagePaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lumbee

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Poor
Exceptional
2,002
SOCIAL INDEX
17.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
276th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Lumbee Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,033,864 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.833. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to an increase of 6.2 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Lumbee Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($54,644 compared to $89,496, a difference of 63.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $97,880, a difference of 62.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $104,992, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 18.8%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $41,527, a difference of 27.8%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $48,913, a difference of 32.6%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$29,845
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Tragic
$68,679
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Tragic
$54,644
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,876
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$41,715
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,500
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$34,584
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$60,305
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$65,113
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$40,550
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.3%
Good
25.3%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 130.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 110.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (33.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 110.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 53.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 56.8%), and single female poverty (33.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 65.2%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
23.5%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.1%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.9%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
30.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
25.2%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
33.0%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
28.5%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.2%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.7%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
9.9%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 94.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 83.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.4%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
5.2%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 10.3%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
56.8%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.6%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
65.5%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 58.9%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 47.6%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.65%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.0%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 5.9%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.3%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.6%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.8%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
48.2%
Excellent
30.3%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 45.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.52%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.3%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.9%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.1%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Poor
6.0%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 114.1%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 100.6%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 88.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.060%), 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and 5th grade (97.8% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.22%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.4%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.7%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.2%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.9%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.1%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.8%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.1%
Exceptional
2.2%

Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 69.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 65.7%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.9%).
Lumbee vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricLumbeeImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Tragic
15.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
15.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
32.7%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.2%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.1%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Exceptional
2.3%