Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
6,462
SOCIAL INDEX
62.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
152nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,089,777 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.011. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.0 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,539 compared to $47,394, a difference of 8.9%), householder income under 25 years ($55,714 compared to $51,914, a difference of 7.3%), and median male earnings ($55,241 compared to $57,352, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,089 compared to $63,643, a difference of 0.70%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,109 compared to $104,992, a difference of 1.1%), and wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Per Capita Income | Average $43,539 | Exceptional $47,394 |
| Median Family Income | Excellent $106,252 | Exceptional $108,830 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,541 | Exceptional $89,496 |
| Median Earnings | Excellent $47,671 | Exceptional $48,913 |
| Median Male Earnings | Good $55,241 | Exceptional $57,352 |
| Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,558 | Exceptional $41,527 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,714 | Fair $51,914 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $100,283 | Excellent $97,880 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,109 | Exceptional $104,992 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,089 | Exceptional $63,643 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.8% | Good 25.3% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.1%), single father poverty (14.4% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 12.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.35%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.68%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.79%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Families | Excellent 8.5% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Males | Excellent 10.6% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Females | Excellent 12.7% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.8% | Good 19.8% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Good 12.6% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.4% | Good 16.1% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.1% | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.7%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.52%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.94%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 66.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.8% | Exceptional 80.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 38.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.1% | Exceptional 75.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.4%), family households (67.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 6.3%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.19, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 0.090%), currently married (47.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Family Households | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 63.5% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.1% | Exceptional 27.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Average 46.3% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.36 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Good 6.2% |
| Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Average 46.7% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.4% | Excellent 11.9% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.4% | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 36.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 7.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.6%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Excellent 9.9% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Excellent 90.2% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.6% | Good 55.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.1% | Fair 19.1% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 55.3%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.7%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.5% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 92.1% | Exceptional 94.4% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Exceptional 93.4% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.6% | Exceptional 92.1% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 87.2% | Exceptional 90.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.1% | Exceptional 87.1% |
| College, Under 1 year | Fair 64.5% | Exceptional 68.9% |
| College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.5% | Exceptional 63.3% |
| Associate's Degree | Fair 45.2% | Exceptional 50.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.8% | Exceptional 42.6% |
| Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 17.4% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.14%), male disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.77%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Fair 6.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Exceptional 22.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Good 47.2% |
| Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Hearing | Good 3.0% | Good 3.0% |
| Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Poor 17.5% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |