Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Trinidadian and Tobagonian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Trinidadians and Tobagonians

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Poor
Exceptional
1,572
SOCIAL INDEX
13.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
298th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Trinidadian and Tobagonian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,471,810 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to a decrease of 2.7 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Trinidadian and Tobagonian Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 31.1%), median family income ($94,466 compared to $108,830, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $63,643, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $51,914, a difference of 1.4%), median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $41,527, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($45,820 compared to $48,913, a difference of 6.8%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,655
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,466
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,402
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,820
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,446
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,958
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,631
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,856
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,357
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,327
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
19.3%
Good
25.3%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 60.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 43.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.15%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.4%), and single mother poverty (29.6% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 5.4%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.0%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.6%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.0%
Exceptional
9.9%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 38.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 35.5%), and male unemployment (6.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.4%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.1%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.2%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 22.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.5%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Poor
84.5%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Exceptional
83.4%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.1%), births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.25%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.9%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.5%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.5%
Excellent
30.3%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 141.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 42.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 18.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 36.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 40.3%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.7%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.3%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.9%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.3%
Poor
6.0%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 43.0%), no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 39.3%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.80%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.9%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.6%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.7%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
4.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.7%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.1%), male disability (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.9%).
Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricTrinidadian and TobagonianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
23.9%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.7%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%