Houma vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Houma
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Houma
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
384
SOCIAL INDEX
1.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
346th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Houma Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,902,510 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.980. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.066% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to an increase of 65.9 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Houma vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (38.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 52.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $104,992, a difference of 45.6%), and per capita income ($32,996 compared to $47,394, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $57,352, a difference of 13.5%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $51,914, a difference of 17.0%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $48,913, a difference of 25.6%).
Income Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $32,996 | Exceptional $47,394 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,188 | Exceptional $108,830 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $62,575 | Exceptional $89,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,949 | Exceptional $48,913 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,547 | Exceptional $57,352 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $30,343 | Exceptional $41,527 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,356 | Fair $51,914 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,044 | Excellent $97,880 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $72,093 | Exceptional $104,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $44,822 | Exceptional $63,643 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 38.7% | Good 25.3% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 86.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (22.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 80.6%), and family poverty (14.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 78.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 32.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 38.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 40.6%).
Poverty Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Poverty | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 26.2% | Good 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 24.9% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.5% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 33.8% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 26.7% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.5% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.2% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 81.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 55.4%), and male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.96%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Fair 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.1% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.4% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 6.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 59.5% | Exceptional 66.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 72.7% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.2% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 79.5% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 74.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 53.5%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 30.2%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.36%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.9% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.5% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.6% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 46.6% | Excellent 30.3% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 23.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 16.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.5% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.6% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Good 55.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 16.1% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.9% | Poor 6.0% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 137.8%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 128.1%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 120.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.86%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.91%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.92%).
Education Level Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.3% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.2% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 93.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 92.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.5% | Exceptional 90.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 75.0% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 47.6% | Exceptional 68.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 41.2% | Exceptional 63.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 28.2% | Exceptional 50.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 21.4% | Exceptional 42.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 7.9% | Exceptional 17.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 0.96% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Houma vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 75.5%), ambulatory disability (9.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 65.4%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.9%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 19.0%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.7%).
Disability Metric | Houma | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Disability | Tragic 17.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.9% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 9.1% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.7% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 32.3% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.2% | Good 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Good 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.0% | Exceptional 2.3% |