Russian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,813,584 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.694. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.022% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 22.0 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,398 compared to $97,880, a difference of 12.8%), per capita income ($53,154 compared to $47,394, a difference of 12.1%), and median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $57,352, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $51,914, a difference of 4.8%), householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $63,643, a difference of 6.3%), and median female earnings ($44,169 compared to $41,527, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 11.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.60%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.87%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.99%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.12 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.1%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.8%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.9%), female disability (11.8% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.1%).