Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Fair
Exceptional
3,365
SOCIAL INDEX
31.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
222nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,718,945 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to an increase of 14.6 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,827 compared to $47,394, a difference of 19.0%), median family income ($94,472 compared to $108,830, a difference of 15.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $104,992, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $51,914, a difference of 6.5%), median female earnings ($38,028 compared to $41,527, a difference of 9.2%), and wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.9%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,827
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,472
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Tragic
$78,682
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,998
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,298
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,028
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,749
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$86,736
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,385
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$57,114
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.8%
Good
25.3%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 38.6%), receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
22.6%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.6%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.3%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.9%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.61%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.62%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.3%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.0%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.3%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.3%), births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.64%), family households (62.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Tragic
62.6%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.4%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.0%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.3%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
32.9%
Excellent
30.3%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.61%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.7%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 68.6%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.5%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.9%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.7%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.5%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.7%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.5%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 15.3%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Burma/MyanmarImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Average
5.6%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.2%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Average
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%