Paraguayan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,148,136 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Paraguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.275. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Paraguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.055% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Paraguayans corresponds to an increase of 54.7 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,615 compared to $97,880, a difference of 8.9%), householder income under 25 years ($55,614 compared to $51,914, a difference of 7.1%), and median household income ($95,737 compared to $89,496, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,443 compared to $63,643, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and median female earnings ($43,173 compared to $41,527, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 18.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and single male poverty (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.030%), poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and family poverty (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 18.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.78%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.3%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.43%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.97%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 45.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 5.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.4%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 64.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.33%), ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.9%).