British West Indian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 72,682,066 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.099. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to a decrease of 12.0 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 40.7%), householder income over 65 years ($51,463 compared to $63,643, a difference of 23.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $104,992, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $51,914, a difference of 0.14%), median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $41,527, a difference of 3.0%), and median earnings ($44,552 compared to $48,913, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 79.8%), married-couple family poverty (7.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 64.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 6.9%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 47.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 46.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (13.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 30.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 36.0%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 25.2%), and married-couple households (38.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.32 compared to 3.19, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 201.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 75.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 66.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 28.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 57.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 66.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.0%), no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 46.2%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.4%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.7%), and disability age under 5 (0.99% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.0%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.8%).