Estonian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,844,294 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Estonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.640. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Estonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.217% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Estonians corresponds to an increase of 216.7 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,269 compared to $97,880, a difference of 9.6%), per capita income ($51,875 compared to $47,394, a difference of 9.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($114,220 compared to $104,992, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,523 compared to $51,914, a difference of 0.76%), median female earnings ($43,106 compared to $41,527, a difference of 3.8%), and median earnings ($51,772 compared to $48,913, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.76%), single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.99%), and single female poverty (19.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.060%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.58%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.77%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.6%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.90%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 5.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.12%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.7%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 15.1%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 28.3%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.1%).