Cuban vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,737,072 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Cuban communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.235. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cubans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cubans corresponds to a decrease of 0.6 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($49,152 compared to $63,643, a difference of 29.5%), median family income ($84,981 compared to $108,830, a difference of 28.1%), and per capita income ($37,383 compared to $47,394, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,655 compared to $51,914, a difference of 2.5%), wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and median female earnings ($34,942 compared to $41,527, a difference of 18.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (18.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 83.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (16.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 56.6%), and married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.15%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and single female poverty (21.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.50%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.90%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 19.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 29.8%), divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple households (45.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 58.7%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 44.5%), and no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 34.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cuban and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.51%), male disability (11.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.5%).