Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,661,169 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,372 compared to $47,394, a difference of 20.4%), median family income ($92,231 compared to $108,830, a difference of 18.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,474 compared to $63,643, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,275 compared to $51,914, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,751 compared to $97,880, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 62.2%), married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 53.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother poverty (29.8% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.5%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 17.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 20.7%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.6%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple households (45.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.19, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.23%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.96%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 45.7%), and master's degree (12.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.57%), male disability (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.2%).