Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from South America
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from South America

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Average
Exceptional
4,371
SOCIAL INDEX
41.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
200th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from South America Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,489,112 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.134. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from South America Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($100,414 compared to $108,830, a difference of 8.4%), householder income over 65 years ($59,151 compared to $63,643, a difference of 7.6%), and per capita income ($44,068 compared to $47,394, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 2.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,042 compared to $97,880, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,268 compared to $51,914, a difference of 4.5%).
Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricImmigrants from South AmericaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,068
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,414
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Average
$85,611
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Average
$46,548
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,962
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,643
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,268
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$94,042
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,126
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,151
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.6%
Good
25.3%

Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 32.1%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.34%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from South AmericaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Fair
12.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Poor
9.5%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Fair
11.3%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.9%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.7%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.4%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.9%

Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.8%).
Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from South AmericaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Good
8.6%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.6%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%

Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.63%).
Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from South AmericaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.1%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and family households (65.6% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.72%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.92%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from South AmericaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Good
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.7%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Poor
45.7%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.2%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
32.0%
Excellent
30.3%

Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 14.4%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.3%).
Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from South AmericaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.8%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.2%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.7%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Poor
6.0%

Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 31.5%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.3%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.64%).
Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from South AmericaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.4%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.4%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.7%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Good
38.6%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.2%

Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.9%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from South America vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from South AmericaImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Exceptional
10.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.7%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%