Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
3,663
SOCIAL INDEX
34.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
212th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Chickasaw Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,566,967 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to an increase of 17.5 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,475 compared to $47,394, a difference of 29.9%), median household income ($70,005 compared to $89,496, a difference of 27.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,193 compared to $104,992, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 7.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $51,914, a difference of 16.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $63,643, a difference of 18.4%).
Income Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,475 | Exceptional $47,394 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $85,356 | Exceptional $108,830 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $70,005 | Exceptional $89,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,672 | Exceptional $48,913 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,832 | Exceptional $57,352 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $34,414 | Exceptional $41,527 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $44,763 | Fair $51,914 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $77,929 | Excellent $97,880 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $82,193 | Exceptional $104,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $53,732 | Exceptional $63,643 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.2% | Good 25.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 37.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 35.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.94%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and single father poverty (19.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 17.5%).
Poverty Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Poverty | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 24.5% | Good 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 17.0% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.8% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.5% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.3% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 19.0% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 34.4% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 26.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 2.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Excellent 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Fair 6.7% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.3% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.0% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (76.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.95%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 62.3% | Exceptional 66.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.3% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 80.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 22.7%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.080%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.17%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.89%).
Family Structure Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.2% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 45.9% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Average 46.6% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.2% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.3% | Excellent 30.3% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 16.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.0% | Good 55.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Poor 6.0% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 56.8%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 52.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%).
Education Level Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Excellent 94.1% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Fair 92.3% | Exceptional 93.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 92.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 90.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.4% | Exceptional 68.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.3% | Exceptional 63.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 50.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 42.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.4% | Exceptional 17.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 52.3%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 5.5%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.8%).
Disability Metric | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Disability | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 15.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.8% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 30.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.2% | Good 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.5% | Good 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.5% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.3% |