Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Micronesia
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Micronesia
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
2,691
SOCIAL INDEX
24.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
245th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Micronesia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,442,090 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.889. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.360% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to an increase of 359.6 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,464 compared to $47,394, a difference of 26.5%), median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $57,352, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $97,880, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $51,914, a difference of 2.4%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $63,643, a difference of 4.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,464 | Exceptional $47,394 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $90,345 | Exceptional $108,830 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,574 | Exceptional $89,496 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,133 | Exceptional $48,913 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,177 | Exceptional $57,352 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,477 | Exceptional $41,527 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,691 | Fair $51,914 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $80,544 | Excellent $97,880 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,864 | Exceptional $104,992 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,000 | Exceptional $63,643 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.4% | Good 25.3% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 35.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Poverty | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Good 19.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.8% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 15.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 15.3% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Good 12.6% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.0% | Exceptional 20.0% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.6% | Good 16.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married Couples | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 28.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 7.1% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Average 8.9% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Poor 5.6% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.7% | Exceptional 66.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.9% | Exceptional 80.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.2% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.8% | Exceptional 75.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.1% | Exceptional 85.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.1% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.4%), single mother households (6.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 11.5%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and currently married (45.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Family Households | Average 64.2% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.2% | Exceptional 27.8% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.9% | Average 46.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Tragic 3.19 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 6.9% | Good 6.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.6% | Average 46.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Excellent 11.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 32.9% | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 25.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.13%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.4%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.1% | Excellent 9.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Fair 55.1% | Good 55.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.7% | Fair 19.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.6% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 62.9%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 62.2%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 62.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.20%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Average 97.0% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.9% | Exceptional 96.5% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.5% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Poor 92.2% | Exceptional 93.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Poor 90.6% | Exceptional 92.1% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.6% | Exceptional 90.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 87.1% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.5% | Exceptional 68.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.8% | Exceptional 63.3% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 40.2% | Exceptional 50.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 30.4% | Exceptional 42.6% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 17.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants from Micronesia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 24.7%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.3%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Micronesia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
Disability | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Females | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Fair 6.7% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 26.1% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 50.1% | Good 47.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.6% | Good 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.1% | Poor 17.5% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Exceptional 2.3% |