Puerto Rican vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,209,499 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Puerto Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.072. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puerto Ricans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puerto Ricans corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($70,423 compared to $108,830, a difference of 54.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($69,234 compared to $104,992, a difference of 51.6%), and per capita income ($31,268 compared to $47,394, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($39,726 compared to $51,914, a difference of 30.7%), median female earnings ($31,560 compared to $41,527, a difference of 31.6%), and wage/income gap (18.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 35.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (12.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 190.7%), receiving food stamps (26.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 161.0%), and family poverty (20.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 148.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 50.6%), single mother poverty (44.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 58.5%), and single female poverty (34.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 70.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 82.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 76.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 76.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 25.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (58.1% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (45.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 50.6%), single mother households (8.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 41.7%), and currently married (39.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.28 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.7%), and family households with children (25.6% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 57.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.1% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 18.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 62.5%), master's degree (11.2% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 56.1%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 56.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.49%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 85.8%), self-care disability (3.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 63.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 57.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 9.6%), disability age over 75 (52.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 19.6%).