Immigrants from Japan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,262,819 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Japan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Japan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Japan corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,228 compared to $97,880, a difference of 14.7%), median male earnings ($65,518 compared to $57,352, a difference of 14.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,498 compared to $104,992, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,932 compared to $51,914, a difference of 7.7%), median female earnings ($45,323 compared to $41,527, a difference of 9.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,774 compared to $63,643, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (13.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 15.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 15.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.10%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.070%), male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.4%), births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 14.8%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.14%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.41%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 16.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.4%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and master's degree (20.0% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Japan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.2%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.22%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.8%).