Immigrants from Korea vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,824,509 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Korea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Korea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Korea corresponds to an increase of 0.9 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($113,401 compared to $97,880, a difference of 15.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,243 compared to $104,992, a difference of 15.5%), and median household income ($102,962 compared to $89,496, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,716 compared to $51,914, a difference of 7.3%), median female earnings ($44,847 compared to $41,527, a difference of 8.0%), and per capita income ($51,671 compared to $47,394, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 19.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.060%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.95%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.6%), births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 15.5%), and divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (66.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.30%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.2%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.6%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.3% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Korea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 18.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.64%), disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 6.2%).