Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lithuanians

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Excellent
Exceptional
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Lithuanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,197,741 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.453. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 40.1 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Lithuanian Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 13.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,223 compared to $97,880, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $104,992, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $41,527, a difference of 1.4%), householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $63,643, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $51,914, a difference of 3.2%).
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricLithuanianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,448
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,395
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,852
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,991
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,228
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,108
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,552
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,223
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,484
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,209
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Good
25.3%

Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 2.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.9%).
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricLithuanianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.9%

Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLithuanianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.2%

Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.37%).
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLithuanianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and married-couple households (48.9% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.92%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 2.6%).
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLithuanianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Fair
64.0%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.9%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.0%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Excellent
30.3%

Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 16.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 4.8%).
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLithuanianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.2%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Poor
6.0%

Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 29.8%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and professional degree (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.8% compared to 68.9%, a difference of 0.21%), associate's degree (50.6% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.45%).
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricLithuanianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.8%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.9%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.2%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%

Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.6%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 4.0%).
Lithuanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricLithuanianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%