Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,047,761 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Sri Lankan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.015. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sri Lankans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sri Lankans corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,014 compared to $47,394, a difference of 7.7%), householder income under 25 years ($55,470 compared to $51,914, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,960 compared to $97,880, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($108,234 compared to $108,830, a difference of 0.55%), householder income over 65 years ($64,201 compared to $63,643, a difference of 0.88%), and median earnings ($48,040 compared to $48,913, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.8%), single father poverty (14.2% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and single male poverty (11.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (14.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.53%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in family households (67.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 6.7%), family households with children (29.5% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.76%), currently married (47.3% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 38.8%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 29.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 23.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.5%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sri Lankan and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.63%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and female disability (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%).