Immigrants from El Salvador vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from El Salvador
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from El Salvador
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
2,475
SOCIAL INDEX
22.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
255th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from El Salvador Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,274,987 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.598. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to an increase of 11.7 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,394 compared to $47,394, a difference of 23.4%), median male earnings ($47,973 compared to $57,352, a difference of 19.6%), and median family income ($92,545 compared to $108,830, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,599 compared to $51,914, a difference of 5.2%), householder income over 65 years ($58,226 compared to $63,643, a difference of 9.3%), and median household income ($81,213 compared to $89,496, a difference of 10.2%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,394 | Exceptional $47,394 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $92,545 | Exceptional $108,830 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $81,213 | Exceptional $89,496 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $42,413 | Exceptional $48,913 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $47,973 | Exceptional $57,352 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $36,673 | Exceptional $41,527 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,599 | Fair $51,914 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $86,913 | Excellent $97,880 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,176 | Exceptional $104,992 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,226 | Exceptional $63,643 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.8% | Good 25.3% |
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 55.7%), receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 35.2%), and family poverty (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.16%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and single father poverty (15.0% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 7.7%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Poverty | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Families | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Females | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.3% | Good 19.8% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.0% | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Single Males | Excellent 12.6% | Good 12.6% |
| Single Females | Tragic 22.4% | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.0% | Good 16.1% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 6.8% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.1% | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.5% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 13.9%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Females | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Tragic 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.8% | Exceptional 66.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Exceptional 80.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.3% | Exceptional 38.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 75.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.2% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.5% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.9% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.4%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.6%), and births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.1%), married-couple households (44.3% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (67.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 5.6%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Family Households | Exceptional 67.0% | Tragic 63.5% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Exceptional 27.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.3% | Average 46.3% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.49 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.6% | Good 6.2% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 43.1% | Average 46.7% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Excellent 11.9% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.4% | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 27.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 5.7%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Excellent 9.9% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Excellent 90.2% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Average 55.6% | Good 55.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Fair 19.1% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 107.9%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.6%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.9% | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 96.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 97.8% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Exceptional 96.5% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 90.3% | Exceptional 96.3% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 89.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 86.8% | Exceptional 94.4% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 85.3% | Exceptional 93.4% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 92.1% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 80.8% | Exceptional 90.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.6% | Exceptional 87.1% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.4% | Exceptional 68.9% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.0% | Exceptional 63.3% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.4% | Exceptional 50.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 42.6% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 17.4% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 14.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.35%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.40%), and female disability (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from El Salvador | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Good 5.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Fair 6.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.1% | Exceptional 22.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Good 47.2% |
| Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Good 3.0% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Poor 17.5% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Self-Care | Fair 2.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |