Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,957,034 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to an increase of 0.2 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $57,352, a difference of 20.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $97,880, a difference of 19.2%), and median household income ($106,057 compared to $89,496, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $63,643, a difference of 10.2%), per capita income ($52,660 compared to $47,394, a difference of 11.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $51,914, a difference of 11.4%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $52,660 | Exceptional $47,394 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $125,956 | Exceptional $108,830 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $106,057 | Exceptional $89,496 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $57,114 | Exceptional $48,913 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $68,960 | Exceptional $57,352 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $46,324 | Exceptional $41,527 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,818 | Fair $51,914 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $116,626 | Excellent $97,880 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $124,188 | Exceptional $104,992 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $70,103 | Exceptional $63,643 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.3% | Good 25.3% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 20.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 19.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.7% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.88%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 6.5%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Poverty | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.3% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.6% | Good 19.8% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 10.8% | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 13.3% | Exceptional 15.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 15.2% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 12.7% | Exceptional 15.3% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 10.9% | Good 12.6% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 17.8% | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Good 16.1% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 25.3% | Exceptional 28.1% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 8.8% | Exceptional 9.9% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 16.3% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.81%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 66.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.7% | Exceptional 80.5% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.6% | Exceptional 38.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.0% | Exceptional 75.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.0% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 22.9%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 14.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.2%), family households (66.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and currently married (50.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 7.2%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Family Households | Exceptional 66.4% | Tragic 63.5% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 30.0% | Exceptional 27.8% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 50.6% | Average 46.3% |
| Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Tragic 3.19 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.2% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.4% | Good 6.2% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 50.0% | Average 46.7% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 10.4% | Excellent 11.9% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 24.7% | Excellent 30.3% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Excellent 9.9% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.5% | Excellent 90.2% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.6% | Good 55.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.3% | Fair 19.1% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Poor 6.0% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.3%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 18.8%), and bachelor's degree (48.3% compared to 42.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.5% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.080%), 9th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.090%), and 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Good 97.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Good 97.6% | Exceptional 97.8% |
| 5th Grade | Good 97.5% | Exceptional 97.6% |
| 6th Grade | Good 97.2% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Excellent 96.3% | Exceptional 96.5% |
| 8th Grade | Excellent 96.1% | Exceptional 96.3% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.4% | Exceptional 95.5% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.5% | Exceptional 94.4% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 93.4% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 92.1% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Exceptional 90.3% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.4% | Exceptional 87.1% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 72.1% | Exceptional 68.9% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 63.3% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 55.7% | Exceptional 50.5% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 48.3% | Exceptional 42.6% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 20.7% | Exceptional 17.4% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 20.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.6%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 7.2%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Zimbabwe |
| Disability | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Females | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.0% | Good 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 5.5% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Fair 6.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 8.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 20.6% | Exceptional 22.3% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.0% | Good 47.2% |
| Vision | Exceptional 1.8% | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.6% | Good 3.0% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Poor 17.5% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.3% |