Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yugoslavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yugoslavians

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Good
Exceptional
6,775
SOCIAL INDEX
65.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
143rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Yugoslavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,223,542 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Yugoslavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.528. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yugoslavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.066% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yugoslavians corresponds to an increase of 66.1 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Yugoslavian Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,792 compared to $47,394, a difference of 10.7%), householder income over 65 years ($58,243 compared to $63,643, a difference of 9.3%), and median household income ($82,186 compared to $89,496, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,028 compared to $51,914, a difference of 1.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and median male earnings ($53,967 compared to $57,352, a difference of 6.3%).
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricYugoslavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Fair
$42,792
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,119
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,186
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,846
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,967
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,573
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,028
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,368
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$97,558
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,243
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Good
25.3%

Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.2% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 8.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and receiving food stamps (10.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.17%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.88%).
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricYugoslavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.2%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.8%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.2%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Fair
21.2%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
9.9%

Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 8.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.30%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.42%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.55%).
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYugoslavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%

Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYugoslavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.4%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.8%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.0%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
83.4%

Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.7%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.2% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.16%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.44%), and family households (63.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.60%).
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYugoslavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Tragic
63.1%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Good
47.2%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.8%
Excellent
30.3%

Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.99%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYugoslavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.1%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.6%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Poor
6.0%

Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 28.3%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.2%), and master's degree (14.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricYugoslavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.6%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.7%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.2%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.0%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.1%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Poor
1.7%
Exceptional
2.2%

Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yugoslavian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.1%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.82%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
Yugoslavian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricYugoslavianImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.3%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Excellent
46.8%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%