Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Arab
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Arabs

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Average
Exceptional
6,013
SOCIAL INDEX
57.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
166th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Arab Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,084,564 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Arab communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arabs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arabs corresponds to an increase of 6.0 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.
Arab Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 5.0%), per capita income ($45,662 compared to $47,394, a difference of 3.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,266 compared to $63,643, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($57,298 compared to $57,352, a difference of 0.090%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,566 compared to $104,992, a difference of 0.41%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,336 compared to $97,880, a difference of 0.56%).
Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Income
Income MetricArabImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,662
Exceptional
$47,394
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,952
Exceptional
$108,830
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,398
Exceptional
$89,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,599
Exceptional
$48,913
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,298
Exceptional
$57,352
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,718
Exceptional
$41,527
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,219
Fair
$51,914
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,336
Excellent
$97,880
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,566
Exceptional
$104,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$62,266
Exceptional
$63,643
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.6%
Good
25.3%

Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 30.1%), receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.5%), and family poverty (9.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.0%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 3.2%), and single mother poverty (29.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.3%).
Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Poverty
Poverty MetricArabImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Poverty
Fair
12.7%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Fair
9.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Good
19.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
12.6%
Children Under 5 years
Average
17.4%
Exceptional
15.8%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
15.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Exceptional
20.0%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Good
16.1%
Single Mothers
Good
29.0%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
10.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.2%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
9.9%

Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 5.2%).
Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricArabImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Poor
11.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
7.1%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
5.2%

Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricArabImmigrants from Zimbabwe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Good
65.2%
Exceptional
66.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.2%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
36.8%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Poor
82.4%
Exceptional
83.4%

Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.2%), births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 3.9%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.50%), currently married (47.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and family households (64.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.93%).
Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricArabImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Family Households
Fair
64.1%
Tragic
63.5%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
27.8%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.19
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Excellent
6.0%
Good
6.2%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Average
46.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.2%
Excellent
30.3%

Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.90%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.90%).
Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricArabImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.5%
Excellent
9.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Fair
55.0%
Good
55.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Poor
6.0%

Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 12.7%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and master's degree (16.7% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.26%).
Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Education Level
Education Level MetricArabImmigrants from Zimbabwe
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Fair
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Average
97.0%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Good
96.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
8th Grade
Good
95.9%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Good
95.1%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.0%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Exceptional
93.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.6%
Exceptional
92.1%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.7%
Exceptional
90.3%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
87.1%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.2%
Exceptional
68.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.6%
Exceptional
63.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Exceptional
50.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.9%
Exceptional
42.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
17.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%

Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arab and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.1%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.24%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 0.66%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.79%).
Arab vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Disability
Disability MetricArabImmigrants from Zimbabwe
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Good
47.2%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Good
3.0%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Poor
17.5%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.6%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%