Asian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,208,582 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.061. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($112,666 compared to $97,880, a difference of 15.1%), median household income ($101,681 compared to $89,496, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $104,992, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($50,057 compared to $47,394, a difference of 5.6%), wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $41,527, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.0% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 13.3%), single male poverty (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 0.91%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 13.3%), divorced or separated (10.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.19, a difference of 2.8%), currently married (48.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.9%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.97%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.6%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.7% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.46%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.51%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 4.1%).