Jordanian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,280,162 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.443. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 8.7 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 5.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,376 compared to $104,992, a difference of 4.2%), and per capita income ($45,605 compared to $47,394, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,464 compared to $41,527, a difference of 0.15%), householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $51,914, a difference of 0.23%), and median family income ($109,865 compared to $108,830, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 11.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.12%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.52%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 6.4%), married-couple households (48.4% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.2%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.0%), ged/equivalency (87.2% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.2% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.35%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.52%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.8%).