French Canadian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,101,749 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.022. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 0.4 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 10.8%), per capita income ($43,003 compared to $47,394, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $63,643, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,672 compared to $51,914, a difference of 1.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,694 compared to $97,880, a difference of 4.5%), and median male earnings ($54,722 compared to $57,352, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.9%), single father poverty (18.6% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 13.4%), divorced or separated (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 7.9%), and family households with children (26.1% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.34%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 25.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 31.3%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 24.3%), and master's degree (14.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 55.9%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 29.0%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.41%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.6%).