Ecuadorian vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,650,023 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.292. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.010% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 10.1 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $63,643, a difference of 15.8%), median family income ($95,114 compared to $108,830, a difference of 14.4%), and per capita income ($41,958 compared to $47,394, a difference of 13.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $51,914, a difference of 3.8%), median female earnings ($39,117 compared to $41,527, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $97,880, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 49.7%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 49.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.72%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.9%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 20.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.87%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.7%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.14%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 130.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 35.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 15.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 32.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 58.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 49.8%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.19%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.32%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.32%).