Immigrants from Eritrea vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 62,524,812 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Eritrea communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.203. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eritrea within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.026% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eritrea corresponds to an increase of 25.9 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 18.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,373 compared to $104,992, a difference of 7.8%), and median male earnings ($53,715 compared to $57,352, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,485 compared to $41,527, a difference of 0.10%), householder income under 25 years ($51,574 compared to $51,914, a difference of 0.66%), and median earnings ($47,657 compared to $48,913, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 35.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 23.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 4.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 17.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.7%), married-couple households (42.1% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.23%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.19, a difference of 1.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 7.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.85%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 48.6%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and master's degree (16.4% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.94%), nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eritrea and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 5.0%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.64%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%).