Immigrants from Israel vs Immigrants from Zimbabwe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,055,557 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe within Immigrant from Israel communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.189. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Israel within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Zimbabwe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Israel corresponds to an increase of 12.5 Immigrants from Zimbabwe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,384 compared to $47,394, a difference of 21.1%), median male earnings ($68,716 compared to $57,352, a difference of 19.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($117,219 compared to $97,880, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,913 compared to $51,914, a difference of 7.7%), householder income over 65 years ($69,857 compared to $63,643, a difference of 9.8%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 0.0%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and female poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 24.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.2% compared to 66.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.9%), single mother households (5.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.6%), and births to unmarried women (25.1% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.040%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.19, a difference of 0.78%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 58.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 26.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 6.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.2% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 49.0%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 39.4%), and master's degree (22.6% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.4% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.11%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Israel and Immigrants from Zimbabwe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.96% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 23.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 2.8%), ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.4%).