Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

Iranian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Iranians

Tohono O'odham

Exceptional
Tragic
9,682
SOCIAL INDEX
94.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
8th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in Iranian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,845,201 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Iranian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Iranians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Iranians corresponds to an increase of 3.3 Tohono O'odham.
Iranian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Iranian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($58,786 compared to $30,256, a difference of 94.3%), median family income ($133,839 compared to $72,193, a difference of 85.4%), and median male earnings ($70,648 compared to $39,543, a difference of 78.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,548 compared to $45,248, a difference of 22.8%), wage/income gap (29.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 34.2%), and median female earnings ($47,421 compared to $33,205, a difference of 42.8%).
Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricIranianTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$58,786
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$133,839
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$109,835
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$58,474
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,648
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$47,421
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,548
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$120,292
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$129,350
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$77,429
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.7%
Exceptional
22.1%

Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Iranian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 186.4%), receiving food stamps (7.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 170.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 165.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 53.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 54.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 67.1%).
Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricIranianTohono O'odham
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.1%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.1%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.0%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.5%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
21.5%

Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Iranian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 101.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 91.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 90.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.1%).
Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricIranianTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
8.9%

Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Iranian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 14.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 70.4%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.0% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.6% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.5%).
Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricIranianTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.0%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.6%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
75.1%

Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Iranian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 98.9%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 97.0%), and single mother households (5.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 83.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and average family size (3.18 compared to 3.53, a difference of 11.0%).
Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricIranianTohono O'odham
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.0%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
25.3%
Tragic
49.8%

Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Iranian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 82.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 16.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.0%).
Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricIranianTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.1%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Excellent
6.6%

Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Iranian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 167.7%), master's degree (22.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 129.4%), and doctorate degree (3.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 115.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.34%).
Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricIranianTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.3%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.1%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.4%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
74.9%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
70.0%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
58.2%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
51.0%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
3.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Iranian and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 112.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 93.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 80.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.7%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 56.7%, a difference of 23.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 26.4%).
Iranian vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricIranianTohono O'odham
Disability
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%