Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison
COMPARE
Lebanese
Tohono O'odham
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Lebanese
Tohono O'odham
7,328
SOCIAL INDEX
70.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
122nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Tohono O'odham Integration in Lebanese Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,892,296 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Lebanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lebanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.065% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lebanese corresponds to an increase of 64.8 Tohono O'odham.
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,840 compared to $30,256, a difference of 51.5%), median family income ($107,086 compared to $72,193, a difference of 48.3%), and median male earnings ($57,409 compared to $39,543, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,355 compared to $45,248, a difference of 11.3%), median female earnings ($40,006 compared to $33,205, a difference of 20.5%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 25.8%).
Income Metric | Lebanese | Tohono O'odham |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,840 | Tragic $30,256 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,086 | Tragic $72,193 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,091 | Tragic $61,663 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,226 | Tragic $36,349 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,409 | Tragic $39,543 |
Median Female Earnings | Good $40,006 | Tragic $33,205 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,355 | Tragic $45,248 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,339 | Tragic $69,068 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $104,734 | Tragic $73,774 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $62,287 | Tragic $49,121 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.9% | Exceptional 22.1% |
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 128.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 108.1%), and male poverty (11.2% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 103.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 24.3%), single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 46.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 53.5%).
Poverty Metric | Lebanese | Tohono O'odham |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Tragic 24.4% |
Families | Average 8.9% | Tragic 20.4% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Tragic 25.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Tragic 31.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Tragic 24.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Average 17.4% | Tragic 29.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.3% | Tragic 31.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 31.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Tragic 31.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 21.6% |
Single Females | Good 20.8% | Tragic 34.2% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 22.0% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.4% | Tragic 43.0% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Tragic 11.2% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 20.8% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 11.9% | Tragic 19.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Tragic 21.5% |
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 100.8%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 95.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 89.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 20.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Lebanese | Tohono O'odham |
Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 8.9% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 7.7% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Tragic 13.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.4% | Tragic 22.1% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Average 10.3% | Tragic 12.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Tragic 9.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 6.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 9.0% | Tragic 10.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.8% | Tragic 10.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.5% | Tragic 10.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Tragic 8.9% |
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 9.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Lebanese | Tohono O'odham |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.5% | Tragic 57.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Tragic 70.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Tragic 31.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Tragic 68.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.3% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 77.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Poor 82.5% | Tragic 75.1% |
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 78.2%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 68.7%), and single mother households (5.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.96%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Lebanese | Tohono O'odham |
Family Households | Good 64.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Exceptional 28.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 37.9% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.53 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.8% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 9.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Tragic 36.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Good 12.0% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.5% | Tragic 49.8% |
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 80.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Lebanese | Tohono O'odham |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 15.6% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Tragic 84.7% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.6% | Tragic 50.0% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 20.0% | Poor 18.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Average 6.4% | Excellent 6.6% |
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 76.6%), master's degree (16.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 69.9%), and bachelor's degree (40.4% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
Education Level Metric | Lebanese | Tohono O'odham |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 2.3% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Fair 97.9% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Fair 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Fair 97.8% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 97.0% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.0% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 94.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Tragic 92.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.6% | Tragic 90.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.5% | Tragic 87.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.2% | Tragic 84.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.4% | Tragic 82.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.2% | Tragic 77.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 52.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.6% | Tragic 47.1% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.8% | Tragic 31.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.4% | Tragic 24.4% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.5% | Tragic 9.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 2.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.5% |
Lebanese vs Tohono O'odham Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lebanese and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 65.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 60.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.0%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.0%).
Disability Metric | Lebanese | Tohono O'odham |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 14.8% |
Males | Poor 11.5% | Tragic 14.6% |
Females | Average 12.2% | Tragic 15.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 2.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Tragic 7.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.5% | Tragic 36.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Tragic 56.7% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 4.2% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 19.3% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Tragic 8.7% |
Self-Care | Good 2.4% | Tragic 3.1% |