Czech vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,418,592 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.428. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to a decrease of 14.3 Tohono O'odham.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $30,256, a difference of 47.4%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $72,193, a difference of 46.6%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $39,543, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $45,248, a difference of 13.6%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $33,205, a difference of 17.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $49,121, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 179.0%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 175.1%), and male poverty (9.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 133.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 29.7%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 48.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 51.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 124.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 113.3%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 104.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 39.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 65.1%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 63.3%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 61.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.66%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (64.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 127.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 55.6%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.9%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 53.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.72%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 60.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 48.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 0.57%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.5%).